Sigmund Oakeshott Sigmund Oakeshott

Die Walküre, Bayreuther Festspielehaus 29.7.24

Die Walküre, Bayreuther Festspielehaus, 29.07.24

By Sigmund Oakeshott

‘Mad’ King Ludwig’s alpine festnung of glimmering stone and hair-tuggingly exuberant Rapunzel spires, all set beneath seemingly Toblerone-hewn peaks was supposedly built as a refuge from the then-on trend - and still on-trend - psuedo anarcho-iconoclasm of Munich’s liberal intelligentsia. Indeed, today Neuschwanstein endures as a case study in late 19th century gilded sword-knot twirling conservative camp, evoking flavours of a pint-sized Richard Wagner fingering his tiny dog-whip menacingly while placing fetishistic mail orders for satin-bowed costumes and corsets suspiciously in his size or his patron Ludwig leaping unconvincingly aboard Bismarck’s spike-helmeted madmoiselle-despoiling Deutsches Reich bandwagon in a fruitless quest just to secure the funds to finish his Swan-Knight pleasure palace. Given Ludwig’s breathless letters to Wagner about this cod-piece-jostlingly neo-Gothic bachelor pad Susanna Puente Matos and our heroically tracht-clad travelling party thought we should pay our respects there before trundling North to Bayreuth via an arcane timetable of charming if circuitous Bavarian regional trains which evidenced in particularly teutonic terminology why it was Prussia and not the fairytale dirndl-domain surrounding us that became the dominant German power.

Our point is that you don’t need to be thunder-clapped in Norwegian fjord to see there’s enough transgression inherent to both the composer - oddly never yet featured on any ‘Refugees Welcome Here’ graphics despite his years in Swiss exile - and to his horse-master-obsessed regal funding-source to make Bayreuth edgy enough without having to resort to thrusting the fleshy forearms of tonight’s Aussie conductrice into the audience’s faces via the mirrored glass of the 1980s leisure-centre-like like set. We could touch on all we saw in this staging of Die Walkure beyond the distorted chamber-of-orchestral-horrors shattered-looking-glass-like reflections of the first violins in their jogging bottoms and soiled t-shirts, but so antithetical was it to both Wagner’s gesamtkunstwerk ideal of the transcendental opera experience, more so even than the Virtual Reality glasses inflicted on us last year, so removed was it from the actual plot of the Ring Cycle, that one wondered whether this was secretly all some long-running Post-War West German in-joke whose punch-line escaped us.

There were the young children in gold-sequined thigh-highs, more glam-rock than Gotterdammering, standing in variously for the Rheingold, the Tarhelm, the Ring, each traded between increasingly rich and sleazy 1970’s upper-crust foster parents. Tomasz Konieczny’s Wotan was powerfully sung star turn, too noble to come off as predatory as the director had rewritten the part. Christa Mayer’s Fricka was majestically horrid, enough to send Catherine Foster’s petulant Brunnhilde off into the arms of Bader-Meinhof-esque earthly suitor, as the staging appeared to suggest. There was the illuminated pyramid with a pistol inside it, half didactic elementary school light prism experiment and half post-modern ironic depiction of a Jagdschloss-set coup plot. I slowly suspected this may be just the sort of daring new repertoire the Munich anarcho-iconoclast opera-establishment really wanted to stage - ‘The Prince, the Judge and the ex-Paratroop Regiment Commander’. Could there be a better named Baritone baddie than Heinrich XIII? But I digress.

Doomed instead to stage The Ring Cycle twice a summer for eternity, Bayreuth’s programme screamed philosopher Theodor Adorno’s 1967 rhetorical question: ‘What does Wotan want?’ - ‘The end’. Certainly this year’s Ring, with its orchestra on view , its bushwhackingly irreverent conductor Simone Young, Valentin Schwartz’s direction ranging from the madcap foetus-on-film opening of Wotan and Alberich as twins separated as birth to Sieglinde molested by her godly grandfather in a dingy stairwell and Brunnhilde being subject to a fatherly chokeing before stalking off backstage in huff, could be almost be re-dubbed ‘Springtime for Wagner’. Borrowing from Mel Brook’s Producers plotline, I was sure some fifth column of malign geniuses in the Bayrisches Staatsministerium fur Wissenschaft und Kunst must have had the intention all along of staging a Ring Cycle so repellent, so drably non-sensical, that they could finally cast off the shackles of the paradisal Siegfried Idyll or the Panzer-rolling, Huey-gunship chuddering theme of the Walkurenritt and ‘de-chronologise and decolonise’ - in the words of one interval grandstander - the Bavarian opera canon for good.

Suddenly much more sympathetic to King Ludwig’s fantastical plan to escape from his cultural commentariat to an unaffordable, unrealisable chivalric chateau in the sky, I resolved to seek solace in one’s closed eyelids, happily remembering the lederhosen-burstingly sweaty hike up to Neuschwanstein. As the orgiastic flutes and violins of the final ‘Magic Fire Music’ swept me away in blissful darkness, I reflected I hadn’t, in this Vienna University Philosophy grad’s retelling, actually seen what had happened to Brunnhilde, but presumed true to form, she must have been chained in a dank basement by her father instead of set triumphally on some flame-licked summit. I also missed the conductor’s bow, but then - and man hath no greater insult to Wagner’s than this, the mystique of having the maestro hidden behind Wagner’s specially designed obscuring wooden lip, had long since been stolen, like the magic of the Rheingold, from us by the Tik-Tok like mirrored gimmickry of the set. A strobe-lit Twilight of the Gods, flashing aggravatingly still in one’s mind’s eye.

By Sigmund Oakeshott

‘That artistic director. What a douche. This doesn’t count as my first time - as far as I’m concerned I’m still a Valkyrie virgin’ protested an elegant brunette as the curtain fell on the opening night of Valentin Schwarz’s retelling of Die Walküre on Monday.

Cherie, the last Bayreuth production I came to was so bad, the conductor cried when it was over’ a veteran Wagnerian of Parisienne extraction offered by way of consolation, while processing like a stately galleon to the Biergarten, unlit Gauloise already in hand. Not so much a dramatic nadir then, as a sub-oceanic trench, perhaps beholding through the fug, leagues above, the dimly gleaming hull of a half-serviceable Fliegander Hollander production of yesteryear. Which beggared the question, as we sat nursing our steins of Kellerbier, shadowed by the bulk of the Bayreuther Festpielehaus; from what dramatic heights, what soaring historic feats of artistic refinement, have such present operatic depths been plumbed?

It brought to mind the example of Neuschwanstein, ‘Mad’ King Ludwig’s alpine Festung of glimmering stone and hair-tuggingly exuberant Rapunzel spires. Supposedly built as a refuge from the then-on trend - and still on-trend - psuedo anarcho-iconoclasm of Munich’s liberal intelligentsia and set beneath Toblerone-worthy snow-dusted peaks, this much-Disney-parodied castle endures as a case study in late C19th sword-knot twirling  conservative camp. It evokes flavours of a pint-sized  Richard Wagner fingering his equally-tiny dog-whip menacingly while correcting fetishistic mail orders for satin-bowed costumes and corsets all suspiciously in his size.

The dressing-up-closet nose of the place: of perfumed silk and compact powder - is slightly offset by menacing undertones of moustache-wax and brass polish - the historic reek of Wagner’s patron Ludwig leaping despondently aboard Bismarck’s spike-helmeted madmoiselle-despoiling bandwagon in a fruitless quest to fund said Swan-Knight pleasure palace.

Given Ludwig’s breathless accounts of his neo-Gothic never-finished bachelor pad in letters to his Lucerne-bound tremolo-terrorist chum - Wagner being a terror in both a musical ‘destroy-Mendelssohn-and-Mayerbeer’ manner and in a literal, ‘Saxon-court-just-sentenced-your-fellow-revolutionaries to death’ sense, Susanna Puente Matos and our heroically tracht-clad schloss-to-trot travelling party felt obliged to pay our respects therein. The piece de la resistance, is, naturlich the arcaded baronial-style balcony, jutting out god-like over the forested valleys below - on our visit yawning under the weight of several bovine Dutch beauties. Squeezed between their ample busts and bingo-wings, dodging the lances of their extended iphone-tripod legs, one only had to mentally paint a bit of chainmail coif on to them to get a sense of what the historic Brunnhildes of Bayreuth-yore might have reassembled. Yet there was little need for such reverie, because if you really want to see shield-maidens with selfie-sticks, all you need do is try your luck at any contemporary Der Ring production and I’ll wager you’ve an even chance.

Trundling slowly north to Bayreuth- accompanied by snippets of Gergiev’s 2012 Marinsky Parsifal wafting from our mini-Bose over deserted platforms - via an arcane timetable of charming if circuitous and oft-delayed Bavarian regional trains, we reflected why it was that grain-alcohol-and-goosestepping Prussia, and not the fairytale vine-hung florid-dirndl-demesne surrounding us, had became the dominant German power. But the real nub of it all is that you don’t need to be thunder-clapped in Norwegian fjord (as Wagner once was fleeing from his debtors in Riga) to see that there’s enough in the way of transgression and personal-flaws inherent to both the composer - oddly never yet featured on any ‘Refugees Welcome Here’ graphics despite his years in Swiss exile  - and to his horse-master-fancying regal funding-source to make Bayreuth edgy enough without having to resort to thrusting the fleshy forearms its maestro into the audience’s faces via the mirrored glass a 1980s leisure-centre-like set.

We could touch on all we saw in Monday’s staging of Die Walküre beyond the distorted chamber-of-orchestral-horrors looking-glass reflections of its kaftan-clad conductor or the First Violins in their jogging bottoms and soiled t-shirts. Yet so antithetical was it to both Wagner’s Gesamtkunstwerk ideal of the transcendental opera experience - more so even than the VR glasses inflicted on us last year - so removed was it from the actual plot of Der Ring, that one wondered whether this was secretly all some long-running esoteric Neue Deutsche Welle in-joke  whose punch-line escaped us. 

There were the young children in gold-sequined thigh-highs, more glam-rock than Gotterdammering, standing in variously for the Rheingold, the Tarhelm, the Ring, with each traded between increasingly rich and sleazy 1970’s West German upper-crust foster parents. Tomasz Konieczny’s Wotan was powerfully sung star turn, too noble to pass-off as the predator the director had rewritten him as. Christa Mayer’s Fricka was majestically, indomitabily stern, enough to send Catherine Foster’s petulant Brunnhilde off into the arms of a roguishly Bader-Meinhof-worthy earthly suitor. There was the illuminated pyramid with a long-barrelled Luger inside it, half didactic elementary school light prism experiment and half post-modern depiction of an all too convincing Jagdschloss-set coup plot. 

I slowly suspected these contemporary references might suggest just the sort of daring new repertoire the aforementioned Munich anarcho-iconoclast  opera-establishment really wanted to stage - ‘The Prince, the Judge and the ex-Paratroop Regiment Commander’ - I mean, could there be a better named ready-made Baritone baddie than Heinrich XIII? But I digress.

Doomed instead to stage The Ring Cycle twice a summer for eternity, Bayreuth’s programme was emblazoned with philosopher Theodor Adorno’s 1967 declaration: ‘What does Wotan want?’ - ‘The end’.

Certainly this year’s Ring, with its orchestra on view , its bushwhackingly irreverent conductor Simone Young and willy-waiving direction from Valentin Schwartz; from the  madcap foetus-on-film opening of Wotan and Alberich as twins separated at birth to Sieglinde molested in a dingy stairwell and a leather-tasselled Brunnhilde being subjected to a fatherly choking before stalking anti-climatically offstage in a huff, could all be summed up as ‘Springtime for Wagner.

What an inspired repurposing of Mel Brook’s The Producers  plot-line, cryptically also of 1967 vintage! I was sure some fifth column of malign geniuses  in the catchily-titled Bayrisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst must have had the intention all along of staging a Ring Cycle so repellent, so drably non-sensical, that they could cast off the shackles of the paradisal Siegfried Idyll or the Panzer-tread-clinking, Huey-gunship chuddering soundtrack of the Walkürenritt and finally ‘de-chronologise and decolonise’ - in the words of one interval grandstander - the Bavarian opera canon for good. 

Suddenly much more sympathetic to King Ludwig’s fantastical plan to escape from his cultural commentariat to an unaffordable, unrealisable chivalric chateau in the sky, I resolved to seek solace in one’s closed eyelids, happily remembering the previous morning’s lederhosen-burstingly sweaty hike up to Neuschwanstein. As the orgiastic flutes and violins of the closing ‘Magic Fire Music’ swept me away in blissful darkness,  I reflected I hadn’t, in the present Vienna University Philosophy grad Herr Schwarz’s retelling, actually seen what punishment befell Brunnhilde. Presumably something suitably niederöstereichisch -perhaps chained in a dank basement by her father instead of set triumphally on a flame-licked peak?  I also missed the conductor’s bow, but then  - and man hath no greater insult to the composer than this - the age-old Bayreuth mystique of having the maestro hidden behind Wagner’s specially designed obscuring wooden lip, had long since been stolen, like the magic of the Rheingold itself, by the sub-Tik-Tok mirrored gimmickry of the set. A strobe-lit Twilight of the Gods, flashing aggravatingly still in one’s mind’s eye.

Read More
Susana Puente Susana Puente

Fidelio, Dutch National Opera 23.06.24

by Susana Puente Matos

Andrij Zholdak’s production of Fidelio for the Dutch National Opera was so terrible it may or may not have cost me a burgeoning relationship. I don’t know. The last I heard was that he was going offline and had absconded to the woods.

         The opera hung over our dates like a storm cloud, although of course I was blissfully unaware of this. I had bought the tickets months and months before I had even met him. They seemed perfectly harmless: two central second-row orchestra seats for a Sunday matinee which couldn’t be longer than two and a half hours, including intermission. This wasn’t Wagner. This was Singspiel, and Beethoven, and one of opera’s finest overtures.

            June was busy and I wasn’t reading Dutch news, so I didn’t know that Zholdak was booed off the stage after the opening performance, Ukrainian flag above his head be damned. An email sent by the opera house to ticketholders the day before my matinee was the first I heard of near-unanimous one-star reviews in the press. The email read:

 

Many reviews state that it was difficult to follow director Andrij Zholdak’s vision during Fidelio. Because we want to make sure that visitors better understand what they will see during the performance, we recommend that you read the information page on our website.

 

         Uh oh. I clicked the link and started reading Hein van Eekert’s explanation of the production. “There are two issues that seem to make this production complicated,” he began:

 

1.     Director Andrij Zholdak replaced the dialogue with his own dialogue (and removed part of the music, but that does not affect the storyline)

2.     The director left the libretto to the musical parts intact. The words to the music are now meaningless.

        

         So there was a new, spoken, surrealist storyline in English wrapped around the original sung, 18th century-Spain storyline in German. I stared at the ceiling and sighed; stopped reading and shut my computer.

         The next day we cycled to the opera house under a rare blistering Dutch sun. Already the tides were turning on this excursion: I wanted bad weather for a matinee, not terrasje weer, as the Dutch say. What set designs could compete with boat-watching along a glistening canal under the shade of an elm tree? I stopped breathing every time we climbed a canal bridge, fearful that my Manolos would explode from the pressure of pushing down on the bicycle peddles. Surely they were not made for this.

         The overture would sustain us through whatever Zholdak had done with the opera, I thought to myself as we settled into our seats. I tried to remain optimistic. Then a low-resolution projection flashed against the closed curtains on stage: INTERNATIONAL COSMIC DAY SPACE CONFERENCE, it read, (“cosmic” in pink).  My cheeks burned with embarrassment. Soprano Jacquelyn Wagner approached the podium in a pink suit. Three men sat with their backs toward the audience in cheap plastic chairs to her right. In an affected, Twin Peaks monotone, Wagner said something about a black hole nearing the earth. I twisted my wrist in my hand. Where was the overture? The budget cosmic conference ended and a movie screen rolled down showing Wagner stepping into a cab through extremely close up, Peep Show style shots. I shifted awkwardly in my seat. There was still no music.

         We watched Wagner go to church, then to bed with Florestan, whereupon she was introduced as his wife Leonore. A portly man carrying a snake crept through the mirror in their bedroom and ushered Florestan back through with him, leaving the snake on an arm chair. Leonore woke up to discover her husband gone. She rushed to the mirror. After fifteen interminable minutes, the conductor raised his baton and began to quell the rising tides of embarrassment within me by at last commencing the overture.

         But there was so much happening on stage during the overture that it was reduced to soundtrack: Leonore left to put on a red, Dora the Explorer back pack for her school trip to hell. Effete Satyrs popped out of grottos hauling rolling mirrors on and off stage. Demons (?) waltzed about with crumpled wings, as if they had been stored poorly and the costume team had no time to iron them out. I was so busy trying to make sense of what was going on and whether any of it could possibly be important enough to distract from the overture that I hardly heard the music at all.  

         Zholdak inserted so much of his own dialogue that the total run time of the opera, including intermission, was three hours rather than the normal two and a half. At some point Zholdak robbed us of several precious minutes of sunshine by forcing us to watch in silence as a robot-man glacially traversed the stage for no obvious reason. An insertion of Beethoven’s third symphony was wasted on a scene change – more rolling mirrors. I pitied the singers, whipping out fuzzy wolf masks and setting things on fire, as if their hard-trained voices and Beethoven’s music were not enough.

        

         I gave up and retreated into my own thoughts. I recalled a visit to Vienna in May 2023, when Sigmund Oakeshott and I decided to skip out before the curtains rose on the Goldberg Variations set to modern dance at the Wiener Statsoper. We feared having the image of thumping, fleshy dancing emblazoned on our retinas forever whenever the Variations would be performed. What was more important: our money or Bach’s music? We made a dash for Sacher Torte instead.

         I tuned back in just in time for the closing of Act I. Nobody clapped. At intermission I asked my guest if he wanted to leave.  We debated it until the bell chimed for reentry.

         “What time is it?”

         He checked his watch. “Three-thirty. When does it end?”

         “Five,” I said.

         “An hour and a half more...” he drifted off, glancing courageously in the direction of our seats.

 

         The last time I had seen Fidelio was a decade earlier, on December 10, 2014 at La Scala in Milan. At the very last minute before curtains rose, it was announced that Florestan would be performed by a stand-in, Jonas Kaufmann. I will always remember his voice piercing the silence of the hall from his prison pit in Act II. His voice had something of metal and earth in its outer tin and inner warmth. Gott! Welche Dunkel hier. I remember complaining about the costumes: dreary, grey-toned and timeless. I retract this complaint after Zholdak’s Fidelio. They didn’t distract from the music.

 

         Less than a week after the disastrous opera, I’m relieved at how much of it I have already forgotten. A small part of me regrets leaving, since I now wonder how much damage forgettable productions can inflict. But I didn’t want to witness Florestan sing that aria for no reason. Nor did I want to scare my guest off opera forever. I worry about the other newcomers in that theater who felt obligated to see it through to the end. I hope they will return to the opera, consoled by the improbability of seeing something worse.

         As for my date, even though we did leave early it was probably already too late. The experience might have triggered a sensory overload, forcing him into radical retreat. Perhaps Zholdak’s Fidelio did penetrate an Ur-Germanic chord of Beethoven’s opera. What could be more German, after all, than inspiring one’s audience to go offline and embark on a Jüngerian Waldgäng?  

Read More
Susana Puente Susana Puente

Carmen, Metropolitan Opera 22.05.24

Cracknell’s “Feminist” Carmen at the Metropolitan Opera

By Susana Puente Matos

For her debut at the Metropolitan Opera, British theater director Carrie Cracknell decided to interpret Bizet’s history-changing, grand opéra comique through what she called a “feminist lens.”1 In her Carmen, this boils down to an eschewal of blood-soaked realism. The opera opens with military being called in to break up not a knife fight between Carmen (mezzo Soprano Clementine Margaine) and fellow factory workers, but a hair-tugging cat fight. At the production’s end, Carmen isn’t stabbed to death by her jealous, deadbeat lover, the deserter-turned-smuggler Don Jose (tenor Michael Fabiano). Rather she is bludgeoned with a baseball bat. The single whack swung by Don Jose is even accompanied by a nifty sound effect that goes plock! when the wood hits Carmen’s temple, as if her head were empty.

Is depriving the tragic heroine of blood – either causing bloodshed or shedding it herself – feminist? I pondered this as Don Jose haplessly clung to his clumsy, phallic weapon. I wondered why Cracknell didn’t opt for a gun. If a feminist lens wasn’t going to save Carmen, that majestic wolf, then for Bizet’s sake, I thought, at least let her die in the face of a more formidable force.

At the very least, the decision to kill Carmen with a Three Stooges bat and not a pistol suggests that Cracknell’s “feminist lens” is not a desperate attempt to be relevant. For if it were, she would have no doubt used the opportunity to shed light on the gun violence which wracks the United States. But she didn’t. Guns are tastefully employed in Cracknell’s Carmen for the sole purpose of sounding alarms.

When Carmen died for the first time in Paris in 1875, it sparked a scandal. “Quelle verité,” one critic wrote of Carmen shaking her hips, “mais quelle scandale.”2 The scandal was not that she was murdered per se. As the opera goer well knows, opera heroines have been crushed, shot, poisoned, strangled and drowned in sacks; they have wasted away from illnesses both physical and mental.3 In 2013 Cracknell directed Berg’s Wozzeck at the English National Opera, which ends with Wozzeck stabbing his wife Marie, before killing himself.

The scandal rested in the fact that in being murdered, Carmen became exotic, real and tragic when she wasn’t supposed to be. She was the heroine of an opéra comique, the lighter counterpart to the heftier grand opéra and the ancestor of the modern-day musical. In choosing Prosper Merimée’s novella Carmen (1845) as his libretto, Bizet intended to shock his audiences who expected lighter,more frivolous fare. Just as Gershwin and Bernstein deepened the genre of the musical to include more complex harmonies and gritty, realistic plotlines in the 20th century, so too did Bizet expand the opéra comique in the 19th, transforming it into a genre that could move one to tears and joy, all at once. He did this by democratically bestowing equal attention to all parts, from the close harmonies of the soldiers to the dramatic, tension-ridden motif of his roguish heroine.4 The stately Carmen became the favorite opera of Queen Victoria, Otto von Bismarck, Nietzsche, and James Joyce.5

Cracknell’s production did not evoke tears. It opens with a flock of pink-frocked women fluttering past men in cargo pants to begin their day in a weapons factory. The pink uniform seems by now to have become an obligatory tribute to Greta Gerwig’s Barbie (hadn’t I just seen them at Jay Scheib’s Parsifal at Bayreuth in 2023?). I had to squint through the dark at my program to confirm that the opera was set in today’s mid-western America, and not in Ukraine or Outer Space.

I wondered whether Cracknell had ever been to the mid-west. As if to compensate for this lacuna in her visual portfolio, set designer Michael Levine staged all of Act II in a Star-Wars warp highway (lighting by Guy Hoare). The audience chuckled as more and more cars were packed onto the stage – first a six-wheeler, then a pickup, then a red convertible carrying the rodeo bull rider Escamillo (bass-baritone Ryan Speedo Green). Was this Carmen we were watching, or a sad parking-lot tribute to Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo?

The challenge of making an opera relevant for a contemporary audience has far less to do with affecting change than it does with acknowledging continuity. For the individual opera goer of 1875, a woman’s murder was as shocking then as it is now. It does not matter whether they filed it under the current label of “femicide.” The Met’s most recent production of Carmen suggests a failure to recognize this. Consequently, Carmen’s murder became a mockery. Through its vague, shapeless suggestion of the mid-west, bloodless conflicts and curve-murdering costumes by Tom Scutt, Cracknell’s production robs Carmen of the bloody, passionate tragedy which once made it so revolutionary. It pushes it back to the opéra comique’s standard of farce Bizet had once so magnanimously surmounted.

A week before seeing Carmen, a friend and I had been exchanging stories about farms, where both of us had witnessed the violence of reproduction. In Ecuador a cousin waxed poetic about the strength of their dairy farm’s bull sperm imported from Spain. I then watched, flinching, as an employee plunged his fist holding a sperm-filled rod upwards into a cow’s vagina amid a mess of blood and fluids and mooing and muck. My friend, meanwhile, had worked on a farm in Montana with real bulls. She told me how, one day, she saw a bull penetrate a large, stoic cow. He pounded into her so forcefully and for so long that the cow collapsed from exhaustion. Still the bull wouldn’t stop. The farmhands had to intervene. They tore the bull off the cow to prevent him from killing her.

Perhaps such experiences should be prerequisites for understanding gritty, real heroines like Carmen. Her strength lies not in her ability to escape death, but in her tenacity to laugh in the face of it. To deny reality is not feminist. It’s delusional, and potentially dangerous. It certainly doesn’t service an opera like Carmen.

“Jamais Carmen ne cédera,” she declares before Don Jose’s knife, chin held high. “Libre elle est née et libre elle mourra!”

1 Ed. Matt Dobkin, “Fearless. Unconventional. Daring.” The Metropolitan Opera. Accessed May 30, 2024. < https://www.metopera.org/discover/articles/fearless.-unconventional.-daring/>

2Édouard Noël and Edmond Stoullig, Les Annales du théâtre et de la musique, Première année 1875 (Paris, 1876), p. 108. Cited in Carolyn Abbate and Roger Parker, A History of Opera (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012), p. 334.

3 Abbate and Parker, A History of Opera, p. 333.

4 Ibid p. 317.

5 Ibid, p. 334.

By Susana Puente Matos


For her debut at the Metropolitan Opera, British theater director Carrie Cracknell decided to interpret Bizet’s history-changing, grand opéra comique through what she called a “feminist lens.” In her Carmen, this boils down to an eschewal of blood-soaked reality. It opens with the military being called in to break up not a knife fight between Carmen (mezzo-soprano Clémentine Margaine) and fellow factory workers, but a hair-tugging cat fight. At the production’s end, Carmen isn’t stabbed to death by her jealous, deadbeat lover, the deserter-turned-smuggler Don Jose (tenor Michael Fabiano). Rather she is bludgeoned with a baseball bat. The single whack swung by Don Jose is even accompanied by a nifty sound effect that goes plock! when the wood hits Carmen’s temple, as if her head were empty.

Is depriving the tragic heroine of blood – either causing bloodshed or shedding it herself – feminist? I pondered this as Don Jose haplessly clung to his clumsy, phallic weapon. I wondered why Cracknell didn’t opt for a gun. If a feminist lens wasn’t going to save Carmen, that majestic wolf, then for Bizet’s sake, I thought, at least let her die in the face of a more formidable force.

At the very least, the decision to kill Carmen with a Three Stooges bat and not a pistol suggests that Cracknell’s “feminist lens” is not a desperate attempt to be relevant. For if it were, she would no doubt have used the opportunity to shed light on the gun violence which wracks the United States. But she didn’t. Guns are tastefully employed in Cracknell’s Carmen for the sole purpose of sounding alarms.


When Carmen died for the first time in Paris in 1875, it sparked a scandal. “Quelle verité,” one critic wrote of Carmen shaking her hips, “mais quelle scandale.” The scandal was not that she was murdered. As the opera goer well knows, opera heroines have been crushed, shot, poisoned, strangled and drowned in sacks; they have wasted away from illnesses both physical and mental. In 2013 Cracknell directed Berg’s Wozzeck at the English National Opera, which ends with Wozzeck stabbing his wife Marie, before killing himself.

The scandal rested in the fact that in being murdered, Carmen became exotic, real and tragic when she wasn’t supposed to be. She was the heroine of an opéra comique, the lighter counterpart to the heftier grand opéra and the ancestor of the modern-day musical. In choosing Prosper Merimée’s novella Carmen (1845) as his libretto, Bizet intended to shock his audiences who expected lighter, more frivolous fare. Just as Gershwin and Bernstein deepened the genre of the musical to include more complex harmonies and gritty, realistic plotlines in the 20th century, so too did Bizet expand the opéra comique in the 19th, transforming it into a genre that could move one to tears and joy, all at once. He did this by democratically bestowing equal attention to all parts, from the close harmonies of the soldiers to the dramatic, tension-ridden motif of his roguish heroine. Carmen became everyone’s favorite opera, from Queen Victoria, to Otto von Bismarck, to Nietzsche, to James Joyce.


Cracknell’s production did not evoke tears. It opens with a flock of pink-frocked women fluttering past men in cargo pants to begin their day in a weapons factory. The pink uniform seems by now to have become an obligatory tribute to Greta Gerwig’s Barbie (hadn’t I just seen them at Jay Scheib’s Parsifal at Bayreuth in 2023?). I had to squint through the dark at my program to confirm that the opera was set in today’s mid-western America, and not in Ukraine or Outer Space.

Clémentine Margaine and Michael Fabiano (Photo Nina Wurtzel)

I wondered whether Cracknell had ever been to the mid-west. As if to compensate for this lacuna in her visual portfolio, set designer Michael Levine staged all of Act II in a Star-Wars warp highway (lighting by Guy Hoare). The audience chuckled as more and more cars were packed onto the stage – first a six-wheeler, then a pickup, then a red convertible carrying the rodeo bull rider Escamillo (bass-baritone Ryan Speedo Green). Was this Carmen we were watching, or a sad parking-lot tribute to Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo?

Taken during a technical rehearsal. (Source: Metropolitan Opera)

The challenge of making an opera relevant for a contemporary audience has less to do with affecting change than it does with acknowledging continuity. For the individual opera goer of 1875, a woman’s murder was as shocking then as it is now. It does not matter whether they filed it under the current label of “femicide.” The Met’s most recent production of Carmen suggests a failure to recognize this. Consequently, Carmen’s murder became a mockery. Through its vague, shapeless suggestion of the mid-west, bloodless conflicts and curve-murdering costumes by Tom Scutt, Cracknell’s production robbed Carmen of the bloody, passionate tragedy which once made it so revolutionary. It pushed it back to the standard of farce Bizet had once so magnanimously surmounted.



A week before seeing Carmen, a friend and I had been exchanging stories about farms, where both of us had witnessed the violence of reproduction. In Ecuador a cousin waxed poetic about the strength of their dairy farm’s bull sperm imported from Spain. I then watched, flinching, as an employee plunged his fist holding a sperm-filled rod upwards, like a lance, into a cow’s vagina, amid a mess of blood and fluids and mooing and muck. My friend, meanwhile, had worked on a farm in Montana with real bulls. She told me how, one day, she saw a bull penetrate a large and stoic cow. He pounded into her so forcefully and for so long that the cow collapsed from exhaustion. Still the bull wouldn’t stop. The farmhands had to intervene. They tore the bull off the cow to prevent him from killing her.

Perhaps such experiences should be prerequisites for understanding gritty, real heroines like Carmen. Her strength lies not in her ability to escape death, but in her tenacity to laugh in the face of it. To turn away from reality is not feminist. It’s delusional, and potentially dangerous. It doesn’t service an opera like Carmen.

“Jamais Carmen ne cédera,” she cries before Don Jose’s knife, chin held high. “Libre elle est née et libre elle mourra!”

References:

Interview with Carrie Cracknell, edited by Matt Dobkin, “Fearless. Unconventional. Daring.” The Metropolitan Opera. Accessed May 30, 2024. < https://www.metopera.org/discover/articles/fearless.-unconventional.-daring/>

Carolyn Abbate and Roger Parker, A History of Opera (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012)

Read More
Sigmund Oakeshott Sigmund Oakeshott

Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg, Teatro Real 14.5.24

An elegant stream of Madrilènos flowed out from under the great grey-columned bulk of the Teatro Real on Tuesday, so exhilarated by the conducting of Pablo Heras-Casado as to have given the cast of Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg an eleven-minute standing ovation. The sheer teutonic brawn of the hundred-strong chorus, amplified by the Teatro’s state-of-the-art acoustics and tempered by the majestically-slow baton-work of Heras-Casado seemed to move the audience to a state of semi-rapture . I last saw the Andalusian conductor conjure up his dark magic at Bayreuth in August with Parsifal. Just as the sub-par staging there of a post-Apocalyptic VR-enhanced Monsalvat was redeemed by the sheer bliss of the closing Chorus Mysticus, here in Madrid Laurent Pelly and Caroline Ginet’s muddled backdrops and gender-bending costumery were figuratively drowned-out by the meadow-set legion belting out their final praises of tragi-hero Franconian cobbler Hans Sachs. Hans was powerfully portrayed by Canadian baritone Gerard Finley, still amply-lunged at 64 and utterly convincing in noble widower / german romantic nationalist guise, as perhaps Wagner saw himself after the death of his first wife Minna. 

Sadly the character of Walther von Stolzing,  roving-Junker turned convert to the cause of German-craftsmanship and the other crucial male protagonist was played by tenor Tomislav Muzek whose upper registers and flabby gait seem to lack that quintessential Wagnerian virility so essential to Die Meistersinger. Nichole Chevalier’s Eva was adeptly sung. Die Meistersinger having been composed in the 1860s after both Wagner’s disastrous Parisian Tannhauser ballet dalliances and a failed stab at staging Tristram… in Vienna, the role of Eva is unusually lyric and was well suited to the clarity of Chevalier’s voice.Jongmin Park's Pogner was a fine fit also to his dramatic, booming bass voice. The hapless Sixtus Beckmesser,  well-sung if played with slightly overdone comic villainy by baritone Leigh Melrose, spent the first two acts in an inexplicably plaster-stained frock coat and by the third act was leering, post-beating, beneath full joker-like make-up. The extended quintet set in Hans Sach's Nuremberg workshop as the Christen the new song'Selig wie die Sonne meines Gluckes lacht' was of particular note for how sublimely it was sung, Heras-Cacado keeping the brass stately but subdued. 

The set throughout was fenced off by 1930s architecture, confusingly evoking more the swimming pool of the Berlin Olympiad than anything of artistic substance while the crucial final meadow scene became instead an ersatz Berchtesgaden, a painted backdrop of soaring Bavarian Alps before which non-binary styled bands of singers clustered around in drab trenchcoats. 

One began wondering if the director Pelly had ever laid eyes on the Pegnitz river which snakes so  lethargically like a muddy-brown serpent uncoiled into heart of Franconia - Wagner’s setting for the Meistersingers’ final Third Act contest. Erroneously shoehorning on an oversaturated melange of snow-capped peaks and Gestapo-esque flasher macs rendered the whole mis-en-scene  like some sort of disturbingly volkisch home movie, hardly helped by Hans Sach’s final exhortations to shake off the ‘foreign mists and foreign vanities they would  plant in our land’ and to ‘live in the honour of the German masters.’ Indeed, given the political leanings of the Madrid, one pondered whether the last few minutes of manic applause might as much be for the slightly problematic sentiments of the work as for the strength of the performance. 

More effective was the setting for the Second Act, perhaps betraying the hand of the master set-builders of the Royal Danish Opera, with whom this was a co-production. Dozens of card-board-built  mediaeval merchant houses, church spires and squat castle bastions adorned the stage, huddled on top of one another. These not only reassembled the hulking mass of Nuremberg as depicted in Albrecht Durer woodcuts, but as the characters wove between them, serenading windows and making midnight trysts, captured the sense of curtain-twitching neighbours and the stifling 16th century social mores that bound both Eva and Hans to share only a platonic passions.  

In sum then, the excellent orchestral work under the measured pacing of Heras-Cacado matched with the powerful Schopenhaueren pathos of Finley’s Hans Sachs triumphed over the suspect staging and disorientating costumal affections of what was a still bizarrely compelling production of Die Meistersinger.

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

By Sigmund Oakeshott

An elegant stream of Madrilènos flowed out from under the great grey-columned bulk of the Teatro Real on Tuesday, so exhilarated by the conducting of Pablo Heras-Casado as to have given the cast of Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg an eleven-minute standing ovation. The sheer teutonic brawn of the hundred-strong chorus, amplified by the Teatro’s state-of-the-art acoustics and tempered by the majestically-slow baton-work of Heras-Casado seemed to move the audience to a state of semi-rapture . I last saw the Andalusian conductor conjure up his dark magic at Bayreuth in August with Parsifal. Just as the sub-par staging there of a post-Apocalyptic VR-enhanced Monsalvat was redeemed by the sheer bliss of the closing Chorus Mysticus, here in Madrid Laurent Pelly and Caroline Ginet’s muddled backdrops and gender-bending costumery were figuratively drowned-out by the meadow-set legion belting out their final praises of tragi-hero Franconian cobbler Hans Sachs. Hans was powerfully portrayed by Canadian baritone Gerard Finley, still amply-lunged at 64 and utterly convincing in noble widower / german romantic nationalist guise, as perhaps Wagner saw himself after the death of his first wife Minna. 

Sadly the character of Walther von Stolzing,  roving-Junker turned convert to the cause of German-craftsmanship and the other crucial male protagonist was played by tenor Tomislav Muzek whose upper registers and flabby gait seem to lack that quintessential Wagnerian virility so essential to Die Meistersinger. Nichole Chevalier’s Eva was adeptly sung. Die Meistersinger having been composed in the 1860s after both Wagner’s disastrous Parisian Tannhauser ballet dalliances and a failed stab at staging Tristram… in Vienna, the role of Eva is unusually lyric and was well suited to the clarity of Chevalier’s voice.Jongmin Park's Pogner was a fine fit also to his dramatic, booming bass voice. The hapless Sixtus Beckmesser,  well-sung if played with slightly overdone comic villainy by baritone Leigh Melrose, spent the first two acts in an inexplicably plaster-stained frock coat and by the third act was leering, post-beating, beneath full joker-like make-up. The extended quintet set in Hans Sach's Nuremberg workshop as the Christen the new song'Selig wie die Sonne meines Gluckes lacht' was of particular note for how sublimely it was sung, Heras-Cacado keeping the brass stately but subdued. 

The set throughout was fenced off by 1930s architecture, confusingly evoking more the swimming pool of the Berlin Olympiad than anything of artistic substance while the crucial final meadow scene became instead an ersatz Berchtesgaden, a painted backdrop of soaring Bavarian Alps before which non-binary styled bands of singers clustered around in drab trenchcoats. 

One began wondering if the director Pelly had ever laid eyes on the Pegnitz river which snakes so  lethargically like a muddy-brown serpent uncoiled into heart of Franconia - Wagner’s setting for the Meistersingers’ final Third Act contest. Erroneously shoehorning on an oversaturated melange of snow-capped peaks and Gestapo-esque flasher macs rendered the whole mis-en-scene  like some sort of disturbingly volkisch home movie, hardly helped by Hans Sach’s final exhortations to shake off the ‘foreign mists and foreign vanities they would  plant in our land’ and to ‘live in the honour of the German masters.’ Indeed, given the political leanings of the Madrid, one pondered whether the last few minutes of manic applause might as much be for the slightly problematic sentiments of the work as for the strength of the performance. 

More effective was the setting for the Second Act, perhaps betraying the hand of the master set-builders of the Royal Danish Opera, with whom this was a co-production. Dozens of card-board-built  mediaeval merchant houses, church spires and squat castle bastions adorned the stage, huddled on top of one another. These not only reassembled the hulking mass of Nuremberg as depicted in Albrecht Durer woodcuts, but as the characters wove between them, serenading windows and making midnight trysts, captured the sense of curtain-twitching neighbours and the stifling 16th century social mores that bound both Eva and Hans to share only a platonic passions.  

In sum then, the excellent orchestral work under the measured pacing of Heras-Cacado matched with the powerful Schopenhaueren pathos of Finley’s Hans Sachs triumphed over the suspect staging and disorientating costumal affections of what was a still bizarrely compelling production of Die Meistersinger.

Read More
Sigmund Oakeshott Sigmund Oakeshott

Lohengrin, Nationale Opera 11.11.23

Have you  ever wandered beneath the glass-awnings of Covent Garden Market, bombarded the busker-bel canto of a sub-par soprano, and fantasised about what it might be like to a have a some nordic Royal Opera House Lyrischersopran singing a Wagner aria to you in unspecified imaginary shopping centre instead? Well as I foundout  to my cost, the private pique of fantasising about such things, is rarely  matched by  reality when said fantasy is finally acted out, with or without consequences for one's marriage... I should disclose here, my only real qualification for reviewing any opera at all is that my wife (and me by extension) share a conducting coach with Cate Blanchett, oh, and of course Granny's stories of 1930s Bayreuth, but I digress.

Take yourself off to the soulless glass and steel city hall - cum - opera of Amsterdam, and you really can see Malin Bystrom, the best Swedish Salome since Birgit Nilson,  sing in an edifice, which to all intents and purposes, both aesthetically and acoustically speaking, reassembles suburban mall. Lohengrin opened this week at the so-called 'StOpera' a portmanteau of 'stadhuis' and 'opera', under the rather hard-driving baton of Lorenzo Viotti, a boy-band-handsome thirty something, cosplaying (for the first act at least) as a pre-Riefenstahl Furtwangler.  The shimmering strings of the Prelude, drawn-out to spar so expressively with the brass, showed flashes of Viotti’s ability to conjure up the sublime.The Swiss impressario’s baton darted imperiously, but with a loose approach to tempo and dynamics, surely surprising and delighting even the acoustically-bereft Amsterdam audience, forced to hear Wagner in such unsatisfactory surrounds.This is apparently Viotti’s swansong (if you’ll forgive the Lohengrin double entendre), having chosen not to renew his contract with the ‘StOpera’. His predecessor Marc Albrecht saw out his stint with Tristan und Isolde five years ago, and an insider of my acquaintance remarked that ‘if you try to leave the Nationale Opera, the ‘men in grey suits’  force a Wagner number on you as final demand, usually with a stripped down set - it’s the best money-spinner they can think of before one goes on to better things.’

Indeed, men in grey suits are much evident here, supposedly the gay array of the militia of Brabant mustered by the fanfare horns of the Holy Roman Emperor Henry the Fowler. Though suspiciously this chorus in their drab tailoring look much like the hunting party from Act II the 2018 production of Tristan. Christof Loy’s direction denudes the stage of little more than a garage door, punctuated by the occasional overlay of spindly black trees. A few rather brauny dancers popped out at the start of Act II, and other than their  girations the only other visual to help orientate the narrative is said dancers forming a human daisy chain to suggest some sort of serpentine form that might be interpreted wings of a swan. Combined with the distinctly 80’s environs, one begins to feel trapped in some past-its-sell by date West German experimental theatre productions, with only the sudden schmaltz of Treulich Gefurth (Viotti too appeared to have lost all passion by this point)  to break the spell. 

Read More